Lenovo 90H7008RMW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90H7008RMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36D9
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170516
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 21:57
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 154
52% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 305
39% 297 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,296
Write 1,026
Mixed 685
222% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 43
138% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,061
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 863
662% 904 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
25GB free
Firmware: JC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.9
Write 47.2
Mixed 23.9
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 151
27% 151 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90H7008RMW Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90H7008RMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $157
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback