| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A55M-VG3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130503 |
| Uptime | 33.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 25 '21 at 15:10 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | TWN-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.7%
Above average
|
51% 80.3 Pts
|
23% 168 Pts
|
11% 171 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7730
MSI(1462 2795) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.3.4
|
6.13%
Terrible
|
6% 9.07 fps
|
7% 8.43 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 70 69 61 40 MB/s
|
24.9%
Poor
|
45% 61.7 MB/s
|
62% 0.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 256 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.5%
Poor
|
19% 6.77 GB/s
|
17% 5.97 GB/s
|
46% 87.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A55M-VG3 Builds (Compare 19 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-VG3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 4x |
| A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples | 3x |
| Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)AMD $59Bench 51%, 6,408 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
| R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $278 |