Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 00:09
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 226
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 600
67% 529 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 200A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 171
Parallax 7.3
4% 61.3 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Nvidia(10DE 2206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 210
Parallax 308
199% 254 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 152
Splatting 174
155% 194 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 167%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB
561GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1132 1269 1138 1218 1261 1265 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,825
Write 1194
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 1,214
295% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 62.1
183% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 814
618% 835 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 243%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 19.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback