Today's hottest deals

Acer AOD257

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOD257  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110426
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 13:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N455
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Memory 40.4
1-Core 5.4
2-Core 7.7
16% 17.8 Pts
4-Core 9.4
8-Core 9.9
1% 9.65 Pts
64-Core 11
1% 11 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 54 55 56 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 52.8
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 53.8
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4D34373142353637334648302D43463820 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.75% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback