Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio XPS 7100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 7100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FF3FN
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 04:12
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 82.9
44% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 211
22% 180 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 81.4
46% 66.2 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 44.4
40% 49.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 213 210 207 207 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 238
Write 209
Mixed 176
SusWrite 205
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 34.9
115% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 144
108% 145 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 115%
Kingston A400 120GB-$34
111GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 92 45 49 51 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47% Average
Read 236
Write 206
Mixed 198
SusWrite 78.2
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 20.8
87% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 104
89% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 85%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 24
Write 24.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 26
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.2
107% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-439.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 7100 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 7100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback