Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	12.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWAA
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100907
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium P6100 6,283 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 48.3 2-Core 97.7 44% 70.6 Pts	4-Core 91.6 8-Core 95.1 12% 93.3 Pts	64-Core 96.9 6% 96.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 4.5 59 5.5 4.4 60 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.7% Very poor	Read 217 Write 177 Mixed 30.6 SusWrite 33.9 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.9 6% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 8GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 50 51 52 51 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	28% Poor	Read 46.9 Write 47.4 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 50.2 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB 8,570 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 1.8 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	120x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	75x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	174x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	168x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	53x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	43x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16