Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 25.5 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 79.8 28% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 72.7 8-Core 72.3 10% 72.5 Pts	64-Core 71.9 4% 71.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 128GB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 111 160 126 148 111 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 391 Write 254 Mixed 272 SusWrite 161 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 27.5 107% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 136 104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 283 14% 283 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	486x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	458x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,365x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	488x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16