Lenovo 23445DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 23445DU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 23445DU
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 19:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 190
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 504
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 3.2
4% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VQN6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 170 179 193 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 308
Write 190
Mixed 189
SusWrite 185
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 20.6
74% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 31.8
28% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 82%
120gb SATA Flash Drive 120GB
104GB free
Firmware: SFPS881A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 162 162 161 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback