| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201207 |
| Uptime | 9.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 24 '21 at 14:48 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.3%
Good
|
65% 111 Pts
|
46% 371 Pts
|
34% 545 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.1
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
13% 19 fps
|
13% 15.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VR-128GB 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 76 37 81 46 47 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
46% 210 MB/s
|
40% 14.5 MB/s
|
58% 133 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
255GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 89 91 91 95 MB/s
|
51.6%
Above average
|
55% 74.7 MB/s
|
128% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown X-STAR 8GB 2666MHz 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
|
41.6%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
43% 92.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,989 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 437x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 322x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 300x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 221x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 199x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 164x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $298 |