Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook 12_ASUS Laptop E203MAS_L203MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK E203MAS
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190929
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '21 at 23:08
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 52.1 2-Core 96.4 34% 74.2 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 67.8 12% 84.2 Pts	64-Core 88.2 6% 88.2 Pts
Poor: 12% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1201) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.1 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SD Card 2GB 325 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 17 Write 6 Mixed 5.5 10% 9.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 4.8 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.74% Terrible	Read 24 Write 18.7 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5 15% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.74% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown K4F6E3S4HM-MGCJ 2x2GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 5.2 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 570 7% 570 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 19%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	2x

SSD
Generic 1TBJmicronBench 66%, 801 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16