Positivo POS-EINM10CB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemPositivo POS-EINM10CB  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EINM10CB
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 00:00
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom D525-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Memory 35.2
1-Core 11.9
2-Core 22.6
17% 23.2 Pts
4-Core 34.5
8-Core 32.7
5% 33.6 Pts
64-Core 31.8
2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$45
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 77 89 83 128 172 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 173
Write 53.5
Mixed 130
SusWrite 108
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 4.4
34% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 86.8
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 22
32% 60 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
447GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 136 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 135
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 135
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback