Gigabyte Z370P D3

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370P D3
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370P D3 (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '21 at 05:09
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 133 2-Core 240 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 794 75% 622 Pts	64-Core 1,032 64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.3% Very good	Lighting 92 Reflection 89.6 Parallax 90 75% 90.5 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 83.7 Splatting 72.3 67% 83.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 299 301 303 299 301 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 386 Write 306 Mixed 252 SusWrite 301 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 34.8 144% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 234 193% 275 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 638GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 100 99 99 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 93.2 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 98.5 62% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 2x8GB 3,225 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 19.2 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370P D3-CF Builds (Compare 7,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 48%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370P D3 - $190

CPU
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,305x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	1,303x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,267x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	754x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	522x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	508x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	239x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	227x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	182x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	342x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	215x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $602

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16