Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 183 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 349 46% 348 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Lighting 30.5 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 38.9 25% 33.9 fps	MRender 41.5 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 32.6 30% 38 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 394 Write 118 Mixed 174 50% 229 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 22.4 72% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 81.6 73% 109 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 81%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB 684 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 64GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 23 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 42.9 Write 18.5 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 21.9 20% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 7,510 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
DDR3 1600G 2x4GBUnknownBench 51%, 1,144 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	5x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $565

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16