Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za) 2,382 User benchmarks, average bench 24% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 36.3 20% 29.5 Pts	4-Core 36.9 8-Core 36.5 5% 36.7 Pts	64-Core 35.7 2% 35.7 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B02) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.89% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.89% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 883GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 134 136 134 170 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 175 Mixed 90.6 SusWrite 144 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GB 3,518 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 29561 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	1x
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
99U5417-021.A00LF Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GBKingstonBench 9%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16