Clevo P370EM

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Clevo P370EM (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO P370EM
Memory	3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '21 at 07:15
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 97 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 182 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 450 51% 399 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670MX 2,325 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Clevo(1558 0371) 3GB Ram: 3GB, Driver: 307.17 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 24.8 Reflection 13 Parallax 15.4 20% 17.7 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 16.8 Splatting 13.6 12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 269 278 278 277 277 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 457 Mixed 369 SusWrite 289 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 38 127% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 226 208% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 118%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 456GB free Firmware: JF3OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 103 106 105 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 101 Mixed 59.2 SusWrite 105 68% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 1x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.2 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 50.4 79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P370EM Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Clevo P370EM

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	10x
Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples	9x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 680MNvidiaBench 19%, 1,365 samples	11x
GTX 670MXNvidiaBench 12%, 2,325 samples	7x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	4x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	7x
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 4x4GBKingstonBench 64%, 15 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,121 samples	3x
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 160 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $515

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16