Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Alienware Aurora R7 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0VDT73
Memory	3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180828
Uptime	12 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '21 at 03:06
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 85.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 224 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 700 67% 553 Pts	64-Core 867 54% 867 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.4% Average	Lighting 61.2 Reflection 67.8 Parallax 63.4 50% 64.1 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 58 Splatting 59.8 48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 54 11 13 13 4.8 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.1% Average	Read 170 Write 93.7 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 45.7 22% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 25.1 80% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 113 112% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 100%
Intel Optane+3.6TBHDD 19 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: 17.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 136 135 180 157 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 120%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 95GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 309 310 309 309 309 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 428 Mixed 411 SusWrite 318 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 48.7 160% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 315 239% 323 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB 8,965 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67.2% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 21.6 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 17.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 83%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	844x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	163x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	153x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 8,965 samples	552x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 9,471 samples	548x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,858 samples	491x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $633

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16