Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 164
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 407
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 54
Parallax 31.2
26% 39.1 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 32.1
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 289 115 211 101 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 630
Write 498
Mixed 500
SusWrite 171
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 32.4
111% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 41
121% 254 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 157%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
556GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 91 92 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 78.3
Write 90.1
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 88
52% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback