Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111130
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 18:27
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 182
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 352
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 15.1
14% 17.2 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 52 65 60 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 53.3
Mixed 42
SusWrite 54.1
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 27
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 18
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 66%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
24GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 18.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 15.7
24% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $239
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback