Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 140 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 223 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21D1) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 0.8 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: XA003R17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 347 351 360 349 353 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 421 Write 360 Mixed 332 SusWrite 351 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 23.4 79% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 218 166% 221 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 81.1 49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	4x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	1x
SSDMAEMC080G2L 80GBIntelBench 29%, 142 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 61 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16