Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 19:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$398
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 69.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 298
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 903
83% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 63
Parallax 94.9
59% 76.8 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 47.2
50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 401 434 452 451 449 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 432
Mixed 374
SusWrite 430
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 48.9
160% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 192
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Kingston SHFR200480G 480GB
387GB free
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 238 165 174 187 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 450
Write 393
Mixed 315
SusWrite 210
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 27
90% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 160
130% 185 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 24.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 23
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback