Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX350 S7 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2949-A1
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130725
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '21 at 14:30
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 47.2 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 126 44% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 375 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 916 57% 916 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
LSI RAID SAS 6G 0/1 859GB 761GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 50 42 44 51 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.7% Above average	Read 160 Write 50.4 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 48 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 0.93 MB/s

SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 8.2 9.3 8.2 9.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 14.4 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 9.8 22% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2 152% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB 1,639 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 24 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.5 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16