Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 125 2-Core 232 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 464 57% 437 Pts	64-Core 557 34% 557 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 41.7 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 33.7 34% 37.8 fps	MRender 34.1 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 25.6 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.17% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 9.9 Parallax 10.4 6% 9.4 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 9.5 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.17% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 151 165 95 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 769 Write 119 Mixed 147 SusWrite 103 61% 285 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 20.2 75% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 124 111% 176 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 316%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 54 58 63 73 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 91 Write 87 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 61.6 54% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 86%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB 12,805 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 383GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.2 9.7 11 10 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 9.5 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 9.7 12% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 4x8GB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	67% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21.1 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 20.4 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	93x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	114x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	66x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $161Bench 85%, 35,811 samples	38x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,302

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16