Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR) 4,241 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 45.4 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 95.8 42% 70.4 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 192 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 34.2 Parallax 32.1 27% 33.2 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 34.6 Splatting 24.4 25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 290 288 287 285 278 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 839 Write 790 Mixed 423 SusWrite 308 132% 590 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 46.4 135% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 330 238% 309 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 236%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 654GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 120 120 121 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 113 Write 68.5 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 118 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C13/16GX KHX2133C14/8G 24GB 2400, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.9% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16