Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '21 at 02:01
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 87.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 259 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 486 66% 492 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.27 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 586GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 99 147 147 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 56.5 Write 127 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 137 69% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 111% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 149GB free Firmware: 4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 35 39 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 36 Write 39 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 39.1 24% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 50%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 6GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7 7.1 5.3 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 39 Write 7 Mixed 12 SusWrite 6.5 17% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 76% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 11.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 13 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,071x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	930x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	278x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	355x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	300x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	131x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	157x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16