Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '21 at 20:09
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 192 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 508 55% 435 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1264 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.2% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 37.2 Parallax 74.9 46% 56.1 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 36.2 Splatting 43.3 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK62B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 165 145 116 116 135 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.9% Average	Read 241 Write 106 Mixed 111 SusWrite 176 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 22 79% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 71.6 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 156 100% 112 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 91%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 170 171 173 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 185 Write 180 Mixed 113 SusWrite 172 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 0.7 9% 3.93 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 1 2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 9,178 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 24.1 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 18.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H410M S2H Builds (Compare 2,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	880x
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	452x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	414x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	214x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	213x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	199x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	95x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	80x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	51x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	71x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	70x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $434

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16