Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 41.4 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 47.9 25% 37.7 Pts	4-Core 88.6 8-Core 84.9 12% 86.8 Pts	64-Core 67.6 4% 67.6 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1854 0236) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.55% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1 Parallax 3.5 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.55% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 40 40 40 43 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 341 Write 42.5 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 40.3 26% 122 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 19% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 124%
Jmicron Generic 500GB 2,959 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 202GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 83 82 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 79.5 Write 75.5 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 82.6 49% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x8GB 3,554 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBHynixBench 19%, 8,928 samples	1x
1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 3,554 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16