Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 11:31
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 215 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 603 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 802 50% 802 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.7% Very good	Lighting 89.3 Reflection 90.2 Parallax 82.8 73% 87.4 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 80 Splatting 70.8 70% 87.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 323 252 238 221 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 364 Write 329 Mixed 223 SusWrite 256 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 37.5 127% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 283 213% 285 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 134%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 11,302 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 51GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 328 324 315 293 310 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 328 Write 208 Mixed 220 SusWrite 308 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 29.2 94% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 265 205% 281 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 118%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 294GB free Firmware: AM0P2D SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 90 86 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 80.1 Write 92.8 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 90.8 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 22,102 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	67.4% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 27.1 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 23.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,510x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,315x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,304x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	889x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	789x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	686x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	1,558x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,519x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	960x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $678

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16