Asus TUF Gaming FA506IV_FA506IV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FA506IV_FA506IV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 08:10
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,094
101% 845 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1E21) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 104
Parallax 25.5
15% 49.4 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 18.3
15% 17.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
826GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1542 836 838 839 843 844 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,562
Write 1,913
Mixed 1,501
SusWrite 957
334% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 82
290% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 1145
848% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 260%
Great: 276%
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 119 83 78 68 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 886
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 96.6
64% 277 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 1.4
53% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 261
174% 212 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 185%
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-00000 256GB
29GB free
Firmware: CXM1201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 250 248 250 241 237 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 460
Write 245
Mixed 255
SusWrite 245
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 28.6
109% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 126
105% 157 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 35.6
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 22.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FA506IV_FA506IV Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FA506IV_FA506IV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback