Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 11:52
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 221
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 331
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.2% Good
Lighting 90.2
Reflection 88.4
Parallax 76.4
74% 85 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 69.8
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 133 83 96 89 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 416
Write 344
Mixed 292
SusWrite 114
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 9.7
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 98.8
DQ Mixed 31.8
44% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
32GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 91 96 83 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 72.6
Write 73.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 93.8
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
26GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 96 87 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 116
Write 117
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 89.5
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
44GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 73.3
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 13 13 14 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 92.9
Write 12.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 14
36% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.4
68% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback