Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 56.1 2-Core 134 54% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 426 42% 346 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Flare 60GB 647 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 98 40 66 60 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 302 Write 96.6 Mixed 134 SusWrite 60.8 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 8.2 68% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 83.2 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 64.2 59% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 247GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 105 104 105 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 120 Write 124 Mixed 62.6 SusWrite 104 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB 2,004 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 180GB free Firmware: 3.06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 67 67 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 64.6 Write 51.3 Mixed 41.1 SusWrite 67.3 41% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB 1,540 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 19.8 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	56x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	24x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16