Today's hottest deals

Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 275E4E/275E5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP275E4E-KD1BR
Memory7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 09:52
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Memory 47.5
1-Core 9.8
2-Core 16.2
20% 24.5 Pts
4-Core 25.3
8-Core 31.2
4% 28.2 Pts
64-Core 29.6
2% 29.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
Sanyo(144D C680) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.5
0% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 64 67 60 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 38.2
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 65.3
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 SH564568FH8NZQNSCR 10GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 3.6
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 275E4E/275E5E Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback