| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161114 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 15 '21 at 14:48 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
72.4%
Very good
|
64% 109 Pts
|
57% 476 Pts
|
65% 1,054 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 369.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.9%
Poor
|
22% 27.4 fps
|
24% 30 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 74 4.8 63 5.6 61 MB/s
|
21.9%
Poor
|
51% 233 MB/s
|
4% 2.27 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
329GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 128 134 130 132 MB/s
|
75.1%
Very good
|
84% 115 MB/s
|
139% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FB 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.3%
Below average
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
53% 76 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 38x |
| Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 28x |
| Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 27x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $770 |