Asus G752VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G752VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G752VT
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190426
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 177
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 517
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1CED) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 38.6
33% 41 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 35.5
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 289 272 291 278 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 600
Write 417
Mixed 279
SusWrite 266
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 42
145% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 479
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 513
355% 444 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 103%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
238GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 223 206 244 227 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 354
Write 250
Mixed 236
SusWrite 213
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 39.7
118% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 203
158% 217 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 124%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV128 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 150 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 600
Write 153
Mixed 190
SusWrite 148
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 24.4
138% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 231
193% 288 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G752VT Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Asus G752VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback