| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200714 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 22 '21 at 22:45 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.9%
Good
|
70% 124 Pts
|
53% 438 Pts
|
48% 767 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.9%
Below average
|
31% 38.4 fps
|
31% 37.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU630 240GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 135 1.2 1.1 2.1 3.8 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
61% 275 MB/s
|
37% 9.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
35.2%
Below average
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
18% 6.37 GB/s
|
41% 98.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,035 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,461x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,304x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,006x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 949x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 734x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 653x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $322 |