Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 13:15
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 267
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 819
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 875B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 109
Parallax 131
96% 119 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 126
Splatting 107
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 210 145 140 121 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 2377
Write 437
Mixed 363
SusWrite 187
180% 841 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 62.2
218% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 793
496% 569 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 194%
Great: 273%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
365GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 86 86 85 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 99.4
Write 83.2
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 84.7
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
361GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 106
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 77%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
237GB free
Firmware: AX002V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 109 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 96.4
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 109
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
332GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 132 130 133 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 103
Write 99.6
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 132
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 67%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
277GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 136 137 137 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 118
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 136
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 25.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback