Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	2.2 GB free of 3.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 10:25
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$34 48,048 User benchmarks, average bench 25% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	1-Core 53.6 2-Core 103 37% 78.1 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 106 15% 107 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 19,503 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3048) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2413 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 3.8 1% 2.43 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 1.7 0% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$29 5,954 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: GM2OA5FA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 83 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 100 142 (03) Spinup time 107 100 12897288384 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2575 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 100 27 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6210 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2532 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 10617424 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 53 723714090 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2580 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2580 (C2) HDA temperature 142 130 201864249386 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	34% Below average	Read 61.7 Write 56.7 Mixed 21.7 34% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.34 82% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 39GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $34Bench 25%, 48,048 samples	465x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 23%, 22,528 samples	321x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $90Bench 26%, 13,719 samples	124x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 19,503 samples	1,126x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 53,970 samples	106x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 47,301 samples	77x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $70Bench 54%, 207,886 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $22Bench 59%, 60,851 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $55Bench 105%, 518,075 samples	16x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 208 samples	47x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 331 samples	39x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 431 samples	37x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $104

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24