| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140225 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 30 '21 at 18:53 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.2%
Above average
|
53% 83.3 Pts
|
23% 171 Pts
|
11% 185 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
17% 26.4 fps
|
21% 25.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 104 56 32 75 106 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
35% 157 MB/s
|
70% 24 MB/s
|
31% 45.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
792GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 96 99 98 90 MB/s
|
49.2%
Average
|
57% 77 MB/s
|
176% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-057.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.2%
Below average
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
38% 13.1 GB/s
|
52% 77.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,413 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 198x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 150x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 139x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 149x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 90x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 72x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |