HP 24-b239

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 24-b239  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B8
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 00:24
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A12-9730P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 47.2
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 129
48% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 193
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 240
16% 240 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 81B8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 11.3
6% 9.57 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 8.8
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$49
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3501103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 301 293 304 25 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 488
Write 333
Mixed 366
SusWrite 181
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 7.1
51% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 25.9
37% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 24-b239 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 48%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 24-b239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback