Asus ET2230A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ET2230A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ET2230A
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150811
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '21 at 16:48
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics 10,893 User benchmarks, average bench 33% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 38.9 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 63.4 27% 44.6 Pts	4-Core 94.3 8-Core 119 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 865E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.1 2% 3.2 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.8 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 858GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 129 122 151 145 152 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 171 Write 177 Mixed 40 SusWrite 142 96% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 107%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2.5TB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 16 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 32 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 15.9 34% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 79%
Inateck 1TB 269 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 713GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 36.4 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 12.1 37% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 101%
Inateck 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 713GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 34.3 Write 35.1 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 13 36% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 146%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET2230A Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Asus ET2230A

CPU
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	2x

RAM
TIMETEC-SD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 46%, 579 samples	1x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 6GBHynixBench 38%, 1,950 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ET2230A

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Asus ET2230A

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)