Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 01:32
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 242
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 786
78% 635 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 89.7
Parallax 79.8
62% 81.9 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 77
Splatting 70.5
61% 75.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 480 491 474 482 487 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 833
Mixed 583
SusWrite 486
198% 900 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.2
170% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 368
324% 502 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 175%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
392GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 413 402 415 410 421 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 441
Mixed 373
SusWrite 412
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 54.2
178% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: CXB73D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 241 234 242 237 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 347
Write 264
Mixed 292
SusWrite 239
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 54
182% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 436
299% 371 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 100%
Great: 243%
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70
408GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 344 402 346 410 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 359
Write 425
Mixed 295
SusWrite 384
83% 365 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 30.7
122% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 224
192% 282 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
387GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 117 117 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 112
Write 102
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 8 341 279 60 24.1" 1920 1200 DELA0B9 DELL U2415
Typical GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Phoenix SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $548
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback