Medion Erazer X7843 MD99883

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X7843 MD99883  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RG1M
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 57
2-Core 158
54% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 372
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 6780) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.1% Below average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 58
Parallax 47.9
41% 52 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 46.1
36% 43.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 60%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.57 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.5
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 21 23 22 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
668GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 101
60% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2.5TB free, PID fc77
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 157 158 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 168
Write 174
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 157
171% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 7 5 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4C U28E590
Typical Erazer X7843 MD99883 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Medion Erazer X7843 MD99883

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback