PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X470 Gaming K4 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190805 |
Uptime | 5.5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 21 '21 at 11:34 |
Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 20 36 30 30 MB/s
|
47%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
48GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 107 116 133 133 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
190GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 94 100 115 116 MB/s
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
74GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
199GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 66 64 67 67 68 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
65.3%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | SAM0A3E S27C350 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 121x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $195Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 55x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 27x |
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples | 23x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $472 |