HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FE
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200630
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 08:55
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 199
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 632
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 148
Parallax 147
120% 148 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 126
Splatting 115
112% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,786
Write 658
Mixed 599
220% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 59.6
200% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 654
DQ Mixed 689
528% 718 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
256GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 208 161 155 158 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 474
Mixed 390
SusWrite 215
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 43.6
149% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 370
280% 376 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
98GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 81 79 74 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 90.3
Write 107
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 81.3
66% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6S8ME-8X 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 30.7
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 5R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 47% 43 108 5 144 27" 2560 1440 AOC2702 Q27G2G4
History: Score 38: 4R 5G 3B | Score 52: 5R 6G 9B
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback