OEM BTC B250C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardOEM BTC B250C  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 20:14
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 195
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 293
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 78% Great: 91%
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 3.9
2% 30.1 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 6.3
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 22 17 17 32 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 71.3
Write 70.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 30.8
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BS-D4-8G-SO-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.7" 1280 720 AOC0CCD 28E850
Typical BTC B250C Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: OEM BTC B250C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback