Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 07:07
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 122
54% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 278
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 84.5
52% 69.7 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 46.1
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 25 25 25 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 334
Write 36.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 25.5
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 15.2
68% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 44.6
57% 107 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
416GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 65 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 76.3
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 66.9
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 10
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 6R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 13% 158 105 5 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACI24F3 ASUS VH242H
History: Score 32: 3R 3G 8B | Score 48: 6R 3G 9B | Score 59: 6R 7G 8B
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback