Today's hottest deals

CDM DQ67SW-R01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCDM DQ67SW-R01  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120210
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 13:01
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$71
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 173
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 336
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Device(0000 E205) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 143 145 133 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 461
Write 447
Mixed 304
SusWrite 166
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 36.3
121% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 177
184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 108%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
175GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 450 295 242 246 246 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 424
Write 436
Mixed 368
SusWrite 320
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 29.3
94% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 324
246% 332 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 8% 74 20 15 60 24" 1920 1080 SAM068B SMBX2440
History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 18: 2R 2G 2B
Typical DQ67SW-R01 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: CDM DQ67SW-R01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback