Asrock X470 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '21 at 01:10
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 84.7 46% 69.9 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 162 18% 142 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 110 Parallax 139 112% 129 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 132 Splatting 108 110% 140 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 190 149 184 182 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 494 Write 180 Mixed 242 SusWrite 173 60% 272 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 35.5 131% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 231 192% 280 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 191GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 336 400 411 444 474 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 473 Mixed 444 SusWrite 414 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 49.5 162% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 364 276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$65 6,723 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 22.5 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 21.7 64% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	144	24"	1280 720	ACI24A4 VG248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming-ITX/ac

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	16x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	14x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	11x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	9x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $763

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16