MSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7971
MotherboardMSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971)  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 00:55
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 673
69% 554 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
EVGA(3842 5170) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2103 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 118
Parallax 106
86% 109 fps
MRender 98.1
Gravity 104
Splatting 103
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU760 1TB
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA004R23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 93 140 267 61 265 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 385
Mixed 367
SusWrite 186
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.1
185% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 284
221% 302 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 196 194 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 191
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 195
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
7TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.3
1% 0.55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 86%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
662GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.3
1% 0.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 411%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.3
1% 0.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.M16FE Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 859B CT8G4DFD824A.M16FE Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD
Typical Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971) Builds (Compare 3,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971) - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $802
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback