PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C39 |
Motherboard | MSI B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39) (all builds) |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200604 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Jul 01 '21 at 17:14 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
T-force 500GB 500GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S6OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 214 130 118 118 117 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
53.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29% | 35% | 37 | 268 | 166 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | ACR06AB SB220Q |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $108Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,289x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $107Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 494x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $164Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 293x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 346x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 210x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 198x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $451 |