Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H170-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160314
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 204
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 593
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.7% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 49.2
Parallax 30.8
30% 38.8 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 34.2
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 346 337 315 290 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 364
Mixed 293
SusWrite 313
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 44.5
159% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 265
219% 314 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
822GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 124 125 125 126 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 123
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
400GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 133 136 137 135 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 135
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 134
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
834GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 118 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 127
Write 121
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 116
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
255GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 105 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 91.5
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 103
67% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 84%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
62GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 53.5
Write 69.7
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 1.1
60% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 120
Write 150
Mixed 66
SusWrite 2.2
108% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 121 119 105 115 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 181
Write 163
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 111
163% 128 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
118% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 121 119 105 114 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 191
Write 143
Mixed 59
SusWrite 110
157% 126 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 70%
HGST HUS 724020ALA640 2TB
674GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 66
SusWrite 1.7
97% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.4 MB/s
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 105
129% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 164
Write 136
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 105
157% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
809GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 2.1
81% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 30 27" 1280 720 CND2700 DP
Typical GA-H170-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback